Speaking on the topic Mr. Waman Meshram, National President, BAMCEF told that the topic for discussion is a serious matter and needs through analysis. The topic was also discussed in the national convention at Ramlila Ground, New Delhi, for which pamphlets were distributed throughout India for three months. During this propagation one of the OBC activist, after reading the subjects of the convention was really surprised and was of the opinion that all other topics are O.K., but the topic “Independence movement was not the movement of Independence, but the movement of establishing the Aryan supremacy” is not correct. To know more about the topic the activist came to Delhi and listen carefully my speech for more than a hour. After hearing my speech he joined me behind the stage and offer me thanks. He told that I was of the opinion that I will not be in a position to prove the designed topic. I was thinking that the Independence movement was proud to me as India got Independence from britishers and every Indian should be proud of it, but after listening to your speech, I found myself wrong. I was thinking that I had got independence, but now I had got clarified that I am slave of arya Brahmins.

            Besides his thanks, I was not happy, because our enemy had changed the thinking of our people to such an extent that our people had made up their mind that they are not slaves. Our enemy had changed the thinking of our people as per their interest to retain the supremacy. 

            After 54 years of independence the planning commission is saying that 60 crore people of India are living below poverty line. Have you ever given thought, who these 60 crore people are? Planning commission  has not mentioned in the report, to which caste these 60 crore people represents. These people belongs to SC/ST/OBC and converted minorities.

            Now there is another development. Today 20 crore 85 lakh people are living below starvation line. The word starvation is not cleared to intellectuals, nothing to say of our common people. Our intellectuals thinks that, it might be a name of any disease. But it is not the same. Starvation, means, the people who didn’t get enough calories required for a human body. When a person will get sufficient calories? He can get it if he takes daily food. But 20 crore 85 lakh people are not getting even one time meal. This is the situation of our people after 54 years of independence. The britishers were also not such cruel to indigenous, as the arya Brahmins are. At the time of independence, when britishers were leaving India, there were 18 crore people who were living below poverty line. But after 54 years of Independence the figure had not reduced to 17 crore but had increased substantially to 60 crore and also 20 crore 85 lakh people are forced to live below starvation line. After 54 years of independence the poverty line had not reduced but one more line had been introduced and that is the starvation line. For the last 54 years, the ruling castes were propagating that we had got liberated from britishers. But if the ruling castes had forced 20 crore 85 lakh indigenous to live below starvation line, then is it a real independence? 

            You must have seen on the TV, who these 20 crore 85 lakh people are? The adivasis (Tribals) of Medghat of Maharashtra State are our people. The tribals of Kalahandi of Orissa State are our people. On these deaths, Atal Bihari Vajpayee and Advani issued a statement that the cause of death of these people is due to eating poisonous seeds. But will Advani or Atal Bihari reply, why these people were forced to eat the poisonous seeds? They were forced to do such activity, as they were not getting wheat, rice to prepare their food. What the other alternative they were having? Is there shortage of wheat, rice and other ingredients in our country? No, it is not. The Punjab State alone can supply wheat to entire India, throughout the year. The wheat is produced in excess and Govt. is not purchasing it. It is getting rotten in the Godowns. But our people are not getting it. Why they are not getting it? Because they don’t have money to buy it. As they don’t have money to buy wheat, rice, they are not preparing food and hence are facing starvation.

            UP Govt. has passed one order in which they had given 5 thousand grant to those people, who are not able to do marriage of their son/daughter. What does this represents? This represents that those people who were poor before independence, were in a position to do marriage of their son/daughter proudly, but after 54 years of independence, those poor are not in a position to do marriages of their son/daughter.

            Once I was invited to attend the group marriage program in Gujarat. I refused the invitation. I was asked the reason. For them I replied that, group marriage is the outcome of strategies and conspiracies played by our enemies. Then why to propagate the enemy's conspiracies. Because if we are propagating our enemies' strategies, then we are strengthening its roots, so I will not attend the program. We are forced to live like this after 54 years of independence. If this situation is pertaining till date, then are we really independent?

            There are almost 126 MP’s belonging to SC/ST and almost one thousand fifty are MLA’s belonging to these castes. Besides this figure, none of the MP/MLA open their mouth in the parliament/legislature. They open their mouth only for yawing. They can’t speak of their own, also they are having party whip, of their high command. Though there is liberty of speech to every individual in the constitution, still 126 MP’s and 1050 MLA’s are slaves of the ruling caste.

            The nature had given us voice to speak, if we are not utilizing it, then it will be called as slavery. Why did we elect MP’s/MLA’s? We elect them to raise our voice in the parliament / legislature. But they themselves are slaves of ruling caste, then how they will raise our voice. If by any chance, any of the SC/ST MP speaks against the party high command, then he is removed even from primary membership of the party. There is the live example of Mr. Hiralal Parmar of Gujarat. In 1982, there was anti reservation movement. Houses of our people were burnt. Even the house of MP Hiralal Parmar was also burnt. Hiralal Parmar was then congress MP. Hiralal Parmar collected all the relevant information of the riots and went to Delhi to meet Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Indira Gandhi welcomed Mr. Hiralal Parmar. He told Mrs. Gandhi that in the forth-coming session he would like to highlight the issue of riots & also he had brought all the relevant information and photographs with him. To this Mrs. Indira Gandhi replied that she is with the people, who were targeted in the riots, but I can’t decide, who will speak and who will not, in the parliament. This decision is taken by party high command. All the world was knowing that Mrs. Indira Gandhi was the whole & sole of congress party. Not only this but the print media, during these days was propagating that in the Indira Gandhi Govt., there is only one male and all other females. And that male was Mrs. Indira Gandhi. Besides this fact, Mrs. Gandhi told that she can’t decide on the issue, who can speak and who can’t in the parliament. Mrs. Gandhi was of the opinion that Mr. Parmar should not speak in the parliament. When the session was started, Mrs. Gandhi told another MP to throw some light on the Gujarat issue. When that MP started saying something on riots, Mr. Hiralal Parmar obstructed him and said that I belong to Gujarat State; hence, I will be in a good position to explain about the riots and nobody else. Hence, I should get a chance to speak. The loksabha speaker said that your party had not represented you to speak, hence you can’t speak. Hiralal Parmarji went right at the speaker seat and tried to force him to give him a chance. When he was saying this, two MP’s of congress went to Parmarji and one of the MP hold him and the second M.P. Professor Shailani (U.P.) pushed Mr. Parmarji forcefully and made him to take his chair. Seeing all these activities one of SC MP from UP. asked Prof. Shailani that you belong to scheduled caste, Mr. Parmarji is also SC and the matter, which Mr. Parmarji had highlighted, also belongs to scheduled caste, then why you are opposing the issue and forcing Parmarji to take his Chair. To this Prof. Shailani replied back that, what he was telling? He was not forcing Parmarji to take his chair, but I am fixing my ticket for next election. When I am pushing Parmarji, my party high command is watching me. So now, there is competition to get ticket of next election and all SC/ST MPs are busy in it. Hence, they open their mouth only for yawing. The person who will betray more and more will top in the list. The most betrayal will get the first ticket. Hiralal Parmarji throws away all the photographs and information, which he collected from village to village, visit. After this, Hiralal Parmarji was removed from the party. He was also not offered the primary membership when I went to Gujarat, I meet Mr. Parmar. Now he is again back in congress.

     One can imagine, the persons who had made our representatives slave, what they will be doing with the indigenous people. Snatching the liberty of speech is nothing but a slavery. Speaking is the fundamental right given by the constitution. Dr. Ambedkar had given us the right and put in the chapter of fundamental right of the constitution to safeguard our rights. But our fundamental rights are not offered to us.

     Dr. Ambedkar convinced Britishers for safeguarding our rights and put forward the provision of separate electorate. What this separate electorate was? In the separate electorate system, only SC/ST candidate can contest the election in the areas meant for SC/ST and also only SC/ST people were allowed to vote the candidates in these areas. But SC/ST people were kept right less and they were declared as "Untouchables" and tribals were forced to live in forests. Then how other people will gave them vote? Hence, Dr. Ambedkar received the right of separate electorate. But Gandhiji was watching all these developments and became mentally upset, as he thought that with separate electorate the untouchable will get right to enter the parliament and influence the supremacy of Arya Brahmins and also will influence the rule and administration. Gandhiji thought, it will be dangerous for the ruling caste and to stop the untouchables from getting any right, he sat on fast unto death and made the Poona Pact. The Poona Pact created stooges in our society and father of these stooges is Mr. Mohanlal Karamchand Gandhi. These stooges were projected as leaders of SC/ST/OBC. In the separate electorate, Gandhiji made these stooges as contestants. But these candidates are not the real representatives of the untouchables. Because the untouchables for whom the separate electorate was made, they had not entrusted on these candidates and also not voted for them. But these stooges take the name of SC/ST people. These SC ST candidates are not ours, as their father is different  (M.K. Gandhi). The date of birth of these stooges was 24th September 1932 under the Poona Pact and the place were they were born was a jail, called Yerwada jail. These stooges had strengthened the roots of Aryan Supremacy. And after increasing their strength, our enemy is doing atrocities on our society. Our people strengthen the roots of our enemies and in turn they (our enemy) do riots / atrocities on us. This is the result of Poona Pact. 

Today there are varieties of stooges. Some are big, some middlemen and some are of low quality. The strengths of stooges had increased significantly after independence. They are strengthening our enemy. Our enemy had deteriorated the character of our representatives, which made them easy to make these stooges slaves.

The second development due to this Poona Pact and the fast unto death of Gandhiji was that, it created a national mandate against the reservation, for which the credit goes to Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi. If Gandhiji could not hare done the fast this national anti reservation feeling could not have created. Hence, I call Mohandas Karamchand Gandhi as the founder of anti-reservation movement. Gandhiji was Bania and Banias are miser. But I am not miser, so I will not do miserly.

Once in 1984 I was in Gujarat. Before that in 1982, there were many anti-reservation movements. In one of the programme in 1984, we invited one professor of M.Sc. He asked me why the anti reservation movement in 1982 was initiated from the statue of M. K. Gandhi. He told that we are convinced that Gandhiji had given us reservation if it is so then, why the anti-reservation movement was started from Gandhiji's statue. I told the professor that we are foolish people (instead of saying he was foolish). We don't know our history. The people who are sitting infront of Gandhiji's statue knows their history well. Gandhiji was the founder of anti-reservation movement. As they are aware of their history they are starting the anti-reservation movement from the statue of its founder, but our foolish people don't know the history. Gandhiji had given us reservation movement from the statue of its founder. But our foolish people don't know the history. Gandhiji had given us reservation is a fallacy. We got the reservation right only due to the independent movement run by Dr. Ambedkar; Gandhiji had not given us nothing. Instead, he sat on fast unto death not to get reservation to the untouchables. Gandhiji in his life span had done fast four times but not a single fast was done to protect reservation.

Dr, Ambedkar received the right of "Dual Voting " to our people. By this, we were able to vote twice. First, we were able to vote our people (real representatives) and then in second turn, we were voting the high caste people. So, the high caste people will have to come to us to take vote, which means that they were totally dependant on our votes, but we were not dependant on high caste vote. Dr. Ambedkar's thinking behind giving dual vote system was that if the high caste people are dependant on our votes and when they will come to us for vote, then we could have ask them to destroy the slavery/untouchability etc. Also, they had forced tribal to live in the forests. So due to dependability, they will have to solve our problems. And we could have in a position to tell them to abolish untouchability first and then ask for vote. This dual voting system could have help to abolish untouchability. But Gandhiji stood against the dual voting system by this Gandhiji closed the door to abolish untouchability. And for the same Gandhi and none else are responsible.

The world propagates that Gandhiji was the messiah, who abolished untouchability. But the fact is that still today untouchability is existing only due to Gandhiji. In 1974 Justice Krishna Iyyer were the justice of Supreme Court. In one of the judgment he gave the decision that America had abolished the slavery in their state, also Rome followed the same path. India too should abolish the untouchability. But the fact is that, they had abolished the word untouchability only on paper, but in practicality, it still exists. India had abolished the word untouchability but not in practice. A Supreme Court justice in his judgments has written this in 1974. That means after 20-25 years of independence and justices the authorized authority. So, none other example is required. This proves beyond doubt that still untouchability is existing in the independent INDIA. World's worst type of slavery, still exists in India. And for this Gandhiji is responsible. This also proves that the independent movement run by Gandhiji was not for the independence of indigenous. But the independence of arya-bramhins. Dr. Ambedkar's independent movement was for the independence of indigenous bahujans. There was conflict between two leaders. Gandhiji was trying to liberate his people where as Dr. Ambedkar was trying to liberate the indigenous Bahujans. Gandhiji made the indigenous bahujans slave and liberated his people. Hence, Dr, Ambedkar in one of the editorial quoted that "The people who were not listening in slavery will have to accept their kicks in independence." Dr. Ambedkar did not participated in the independence movement, because it was the movement of arya Brahmans and not of indigenous bahujans.

Gandhiji abolished the right of dual voting system by Poona Pact. Then Dr. Ambedkar put forward second alternative of separate settlement. In the separate settlement programme, actually two types of people are living in the village. They are touchable and untouchables. If suppose there are only untouchable people in a village, then there will be nobody who will observe untouchability. Because for observing untouchability the touchable people should also reside inside the village. A village were only untouchables are residing will not observe untouchability among themselves. So, in the separate settlement system, Dr. Ambedkar proposed to establish new villages of untouchables and none of the touchable people will be residing in these villages. This system if could have followed the untouchability could have abolished just after independence. Also, in this system the untouchable were allowed to plough the land available in the village. So they would have become independent. Separate commissions will be constituted to look after the upliftment of these untouchables. Dr. Ambedkar got this scheme passed by the Britishers. This scheme was very soon going to be implemented, but suddenly Britishers announced that they are willing to leave this country. Dr. Ambedkar asked  Britishers about the separate settlement scheme. But Britishers replied that now this scheme will be passed on to the next rulers. Dr. Ambedkar realised that the people who had made the indigenous slave for thousands of years will not implement the scheme and the indigenous will not be liberated. At the same time, Dr. Ambedkar wrote one memorandum called as "States and Minority" and get it discussed in the parliament. In the memorandum, he also demanded the separate settlement for the untouchables. But Nehru, Gandhi and Dr. Rajendra Prasad straightforward refused the scheme. When the second scheme to abolish untouchability was not accepted, Dr Ambedkar came out with third option through constitutional safeguards. Dr. Ambedkar was not ready to accept the constitution unless and until the rights of untouchables are safeguarded. Like this on 26th Jan 1950, we got constitutional rights. But congress had not implemented the constitutional safeguards. Because if they had implemented the scheme, then our society could have uplifted to certain extent. Also, it could have curtailed the production of stooges within our society. Since our political representatives are stooges, it becomes easy for our enemy to avoid implementing constitutional rights. All these examples prove that the Arya-Brahmins want to retain their supremacy. If this is so, then how we can say that the we had become independent? Hence,  we are saying that the independence movement was not the movement of independence but a movement of establishing Aryan supremacy.

     The OBC people had considered Gandhiji as their leader. But Gandhiji stopped the entry of every individual OBC to enter the constituent assembly. This resulted in getting the reservation right to OBC to 16th November 1992. After the Supreme Court decision, OBC got the reservation right. If there could have even a single OBC representative in the constituent assembly, then OBC's could have get the rights with SC/ ST's. But the information, which SC/ST people are having, is not available with OBC. Even today OBC's are in the trap of Gandhiji and Congress, and they still consider Gandhiji as their messiah.