Dr. Ambedkar As The Member of Executive Governor General Council

Questions and Answers

______________________________________________


PART VIII
From 14th September 1942 to 12th April 1946

331

[f.1]  Primary Schools for Railway Coal Miners' Children

1471. Shrimati K. Radha Bai Subbarayan : Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state :

(a) whether there are any primary schools for children of the miners working in the Railway-owned coal mines; and, if so, the number of schools and pupils—boys and girls—attending each of them;

(b) whether the number of schools and pupils has increased or decreased since June, 1939, and what the difference now is;

(c) whether these schools are co-educational, and if there are women teachers on their staff;

(d) if a midday meal is provided to the pupils at these schools; and, if not, why not;

(e)whether these schools are under entire or partial management of the Coal Mine Authorities or under some other total authorities; and

(b)       what steps Government are taking to promote elementary education among miners ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Yes. I regret I have no detailed information about the number of schools but I shall obtain it. As regards the number of children of miners attending the schools, it will not be easy to obtain the information as the schools are open to other children as well.

(b), (c) and (d). I have no information but I shall obtain it and place it on the table of the House.

(e) The schools are under the management of the Hazaribagh Mines Board to which the Railway Collieries make financial contribution.

(f) The responsibility for educational facilities is primarily that of the Provincial Governments.

Shrimati K. Radha Bai Subbarayan : Sir, the Honourable Member told us the other day that there is a welfare committee, may I ask if the Honourable Member will draw their attention to the suggestions that I have made in this question and also get a record of the children of the miners who attend the schools ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : There is nothing to prohibit the Welfare Committee from interesting themselves in this and taking action in the matter.

Shrimati K. Radha Bai Subbarayan : I want to know, Sir, if the Government will give instructions to this Committee to give their attention to these matters ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Yes, it might do. There is nothing to prevent the Committee from doing it.

 

332

[f.2]  Application of Essential Services Ordinance to Government Employees

1485. Mr. N. M. Joshi : Will the Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to state :

(a) whether Essential Services Ordinance applies to all Government employees; and

 (b) whether protests have reached the Government regarding nonapplication of the provisions of sections (5) and (6) of the Essential Services (Maintenance) Ordinance II of 1941, in regard to obligation of the Crown not to discontinue the services of the Crown servants without a reasonable cause, and the issue of rules regulating or empowering a specified authority to regulate their wages and other conditions of service ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) Yes. (b) No.

Mr. N. M. Joshi : May I ask why Government have not taken steps that are necessary to be taken under the Essential Services Act ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : My Honourable friend's question was whether protests were received.

*****

[f.3] Mr. T. S. Avinashilingam Chettiar : Item 3 in the ...............

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar (Labour Member) : I am sorry I was not here to listen to the points raised by my Honourable friend, Mr. Avinashilingam Chettiar. But I should like to tell him that these quarters are permanent.

Mr. T. S. Avinashilingam Chettiar : All of them ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : Yes, and the necessity that forced us to undertake this construction.........

Mr. T. S. Avinashilingam Chettiar: I know that. I know my Honourable friend can give a lecture on that.

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I think it is a great advantage that in the midst of so much money which is being spent on building temporary structures, we have succeeded in securing at least these quarters as permanent houses which will enable us to house a large number of clerics' population which will be working in the Secretariat.

333

[f.4]  Erection of Wall Round a Mosque in Karol Bagh, Delhi

Maulvi Muhammad Abdul Ghani: Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state :

(a) whether he is aware that under the Delhi Muslim Wakfs Act (XIII of 1943), there has been established a Sunni Majlis-e-Awkaf; if so, whether the said Sunni Majlis-e-Awkaf is the sole Administrator of all the Wakfs in the Province of Delhi;

(b) whether he is aware of the existence of an old mosque and a grave yard attached to it in the Karol Bagh area in New Delhi near the recently constructed Government quarters and that the Muslims do offer their prayers therein;

(c) whether it is a fact that the Central Public Works Department intends to enclose the said mosque by erecting a wall around it and thereby stopping ingress of Muslims in it for offering their prayers;

(d) whether his Department has sought the permission of the Sunni Majlis-e-Awkaf to erect a wall around it;

(e) whether it is a fact that on the objections of the Mussalmans offering their prayers in the said mosque the contractor and men of the said Central Public Works Department is of the Central Public Works Department now ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: (a) Yes. (b) I am not aware of the existence of any old mosque although evidence of an old and unused grave-yard is visible near the recently constructed Government quarters in Karol Bagh. But I am aware of the fact that some Muslim residents of this area have recently built a pucca platform with a thatched roof and an enclosure on this area and say their prayers in this structure.

(c) In consultation with the Total Administration, Government have proposed to wall off this area in order to prevent encroachment on this Government land by either the Muslims or the Hindus. In deference to the representations received from representatives of the Muslim community this proposal has been now held in abeyance pending clarification of the legal issues involved.

(d) In view of my reply to question (b) this question does not arise. (e) The Honourable Member is referred to my reply to question (c). (f) The Honourable Member is referred to my reply to question (c).

Sir Muhammad Yamin Khan: When the Honourable Member says that the Government has decided to built a wall to stop people going on this Government land, may I ask how does it become Government land ? When it is a grave yard, how does the Honourable Member say that it is Government land ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : As at present advised the Government regard this to be Government land; but I am obtaining legal opinion on it.

Sir Muhammad Yamin Khan : Does the Honourable Member call all the English cemeteries and the Hindu Cremation ground as belonging to the Government ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : As I said, I am asking for legal opinion.

Sir Muhammad Yamin Khan : But the Honourable Member has himself said that there is a grave-yard and at the same time he calls it as Government land ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : That is the position as Government is advised at present.

Sir Muhammad Yamin Khan : By whom ?

Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdur Rahim): The Honourable Member has already said that he was taking legal opinion.

Sir Muhammad Yamin Khan : By whom is he advised ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : By those who are entitled to advise Government.

Maulvi Muhammad Abdul Ghani : May I know whether Government has made an acquisition of that portion of the land to which the Honourable Member refers as a grave-yard and mosque.

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: It is unnecessary  to acquire.

 

334

[f.5]  Public Utility Concerns held by Non-Indian Interests

1591. Mr. T. S. Avinashilingam Chettiar : Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state :

(a) the number of public utility concerns held by British and other non-Indian interests in India; and

(b) whether any attempts were made to acquire these public utility concerns ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: (a) and (b). The information asked for is being collected and will be laid on the table of the House.

 

335

[f.6]  Audit of Accounts of Government of India Presses

1596. Sri K. B. Jinaraja Hegde : Will the Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to state :

(a) whether the accounts of the Government of India Presses are annually audited by the Accountant General, Central Revenue, New Delhi;

(b) whether copies of the audit reports are sent to his Department for perusal and action; and whether such copies were received in the last two years; if so, the action taken thereon.

(c) whether it is a fact that serious discrepancies in the accounts of paper were found in the last two reports and no action was taken on them; if so, what the reasons are; and

(d) whether Government propose to place a copy of each of the audit reports for the last two years of the New Delhi Press on the table of the House ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) The accounts of the Presses are audited by the Accountant General, Central Revenue and other Accountants General who act on his behalf.

 (b) Reports are submitted by audit to Heads of Departments. Reference is made to Government of India only on points of importance or matters on which settlement cannot be reached.

(c) The 1942-43 report revealed certain discrepancies which were mostly due to wrong entries in registers. The matter is still under examination. The 1943-44 report has recently been received and is under examination by the Controller of Printing and Stationery, India.

(d) No. Important points are included in the Appropriation Accounts of the Year by the Accountant General, Central Revenues. These accounts are examined by the Public Accounts Committee and their report is laid before the Legislative Assembly.

Sri K. B. Jinaraja Hegde : May I know with reference to part (d) of the question whether the Honourable Member will please lay the audit reports on the table of the House ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : No, Sir, It is not necessary. These are included in the Public Accounts Committee reports.

Sri K. B. Jinaraja Hegde : May I know whether these audit reports are incorporated in full in the Public Accounts Committee reports ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Such pans of it as are necessary for the purposes of the Public Accounts Committee are incorporated.

336

[f.7]  Central Government Servants not provided with Quarters

1606. Sardar Sant Singh: (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member be pleased to state the percentage of Central Government servants servicing in Delhi and New Delhi and having a monthly salary of below Rs. 600 who have not so far been provided with any Government accommodation ?

(b) Is it a fact that a Government servant whose monthly salary is below Rs. 600 is not deprived of his quarter when he becomes out of class until accommodation of a higher type can be provided to him ?

 (c) Will Government please state the number of Government servants in Delhi and New Delhi who were in possession of Government quarters but have been deprived of them on technical ground of transfer from one Government office to another in New Delhi e.g. from Agricultural Institute, Pusa, Government of India Press, New Delhi, A.G.P. & T. etc., to the Government of India Main Secretariat Departments ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) About 65 per cent. (b) Yes.

(c) The required information is not readily available and its collection at this stage would not justify the labour involved, but I would inform the Honourable Member that except in the case of the staff transferred from Government of India Press, Agricultural Research Institute and A.G.P. & T's Office, who have got their separate pool of quarters, no officer is required to vacate his quarter on transfer from one Government office to another in New Delhi.

337

[f.8]  Plight of Central Government Servants deprived of Quarters on Transfer to another Office in New Delhi

1607. Sardar Sant Singh: (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state if it is a fact that in a considerable number of cases where Government servants have been deprived of their quarters, the persons concerned have a total length of permanent service under the Central Government in Delhi and New Delhi for a period of fifteen years or more ?

(b) Are Government aware that under the existing conditions, some of these Government servants who had to wait in the beginning for a number of years before they got Government accommodation, will have no chance during their service-life to get Government accommodation again ?

 (c) Is it a fact that distinction between orthodox and unorthodox quarters has been abolished with a view to enlarge the scope of a Government servant to get accommodation in Delhi and New Delhi ?

(d) Do Government propose to consider the cases of Government servants referred to in (a) and (b) above and grant them relief in the matter of accommodation by taking into account their length of service under the Central Government in Delhi and New Delhi. If not, why not?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Arnbedkar: (a) The Honourable Member's attention is invited to reply to part (c) of starred question No. 1606.

(b) Officers mentioned in my reply to the last question may have to wait for their turn in the general pool, but for how long they may have to wait, I cannot say. (c) Yes.

(d) The length of service in the general pool is always the deciding factor. Government do not consider it equitable to alter this rule in favour of any particular groups of Government servants.

338

[f.9]  Applications for Khas Khas Tatties from Occupants of Government Quarters in Delhi and New Delhi

131. Mr. K. C. Neogy: (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state whether he is aware that formal applications in regard to the supply of khas khas tatties in the residences occupied by Government servants in Delhi and New Delhi during the ensuing Summer Season, 1945, were invited by the 20th March, 1945, vide Additional Chief Engineer (Western Zone) Central Public Works Department, circular memorandum No. WII/3708, dated the 20th February, 1945 and No. WII/3708, dated the 13th March, 1945 ?

(b) Is he also aware that the Summer allotment (1945) is not yet out ?

 (c) If the reply to (b) above be in the affirmative, does he propose to extend the date for applying for khas khas tatties in the case of those Government servants who will be allotted quarters in April, 1945, but have none at present ? If not, why not ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: (a) Yes. (b) As seasonal allotments have been dispensed with under the latest Rules, this question does not arise.

(c) Government servants who have no official quarters now and will be allotted official quarters in April, will be permitted to apply for khas khas tatties upto the end of April, although the supply of such tatties will be necessary somewhat delayed.

339

[f.10]  Technical Centres opened by Labour Department

1697. Dr. Sir Zia Uddin Ahmad: (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member please mention the number of Technical Centres opened by the Labour Department (i) in association with Muslim Institutions, (ii) in association with non-Muslim Institutions, and (iii) in association with independent Institutions not connected with any Engineering Institutions ?

(b) How many of the Institutions under (iii) are under Muslim Administration, and how many under non-Muslim administration ?

(c) Does the Honourable Member propose to lay on the table of the House the names of all these Centres for Technicians mentioned in classes (i), (ii) and (iii) ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : (a) (i) 5, (ii) 74, (iii) If by " independent institutions " are meant " private institutions ", there are 36.

(b) Of the 36, 2 are under purely Muslim administration. (c) A statement is laid on the table.

STATEMENT

I. Technical Training Centres associated with Muslim Institutions A. Engineering:—

1. Abdullah Fazalbhoy Technical Institute, St. Xavier College, Bombay.

2. Anglo-Arabic College Technical Institute, Delhi.

3. Muslim University Engineering College, Aligarh. B. Non-Engineering:—

4. Anjuman Industrial School, Madras.

5. Shia Intermediate College, Lucknow.

II. Technical Training Centres Association with Non-Muslim Institutions

(Excluding Centres Associated with Institutions run by Provincial    Governments and States and with Railway Workshops). A. Engineering:—

1. B. P. Chdy. Technical School, Krishnagar.

2. College of Engineering and Technotogy, Bengal.

3. D. J. Industrial School, Rajshahi.

4. Don Bosco Technical School, Krishnagar.

5. I. G. N. Co., Ltd., Sonachara Workshop, Narayanganj.

6. K. K. Technical School, Mymcnsingh.

Mr. T. S. Avinashilingam Chettiar : What is the nature of these technical centres?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: They are centres where technical training is given.

Mr. T. S. Avinashilingam Chettiar : For what industries ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : For many of the trades.

Sir Muhammad Yamin Khan : Is Aligarh one of them ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: Yes, certainly.

340

[f.11]  Opening of War Technicians Depot or Reception Centre

1698. Dr. Sir Zia Uddin Ahmad : Is the Honourable the Labour Member contemplating to open War Technicians Depot or Reception Centre ? If so, at what places ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The Government of India propose to have a Reception Depot in each circle where civilian recruits after being selected for training may be sent for short periods before being allotted to a training centre. A statement indicating the reception depots already sanctioned, their capacity and location is placed on the table.

Dr. Sir Zia Uddin Ahmad : Are there many centres ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar : The Honourable Member may see the statement and find for himself. I am placing a statement on the table.

Maulvi Muhammad Abdul Ghani : What is the total number of reception centres ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: I cannot make a calculation here.

Mr. President (The Honourable Sir Abdur Rahim): The Honourable Member had better look at the table.

Dr. Sir Zia Uddin Ahmad : It is not a big list.

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: It is a big list. I cannot read the whole thing unless you Sir, permit me to do so. India is divided into circles Northern Circle, Central Circle, N.E. Circle, S. E. Circle, Eastern Circle, Western Circle and Southern Circle.

Dr. Sir Zia Uddin Ahmad : What are their headquarters ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: The headquarters or centres for training are : Northern Circle, Lyilpur and Sonepat; Central Circle—Delhi, Akola or Nagpur; N. E. Circle—Aligarh;   S. E. Circle—Guizarbagh (Palna) and Cuttack; Eastern Circle—Hooghly; Western Circle—Worli (Bombay) and Hubli; Soulliern Circle— Madras, Bewada, Trivandrum and Coimbatorc.

341

*[f12]  Developing of U. P. Technical Training Centres into Polytechnic

1699. Dr. Sir Zia Uddin Ahmad: (a) Will the Honourable the Labour Member please state the technical training Centres in U. P. which Government are contemplating to develop into polytechnic ?

Is it not a fact that Government have selected two places for developing Technical training centres into Polytechnic, i.e. Dyal Bagh and Benares University ? Is the Honourable Member aware of the fact that the Aligarh Muslim University Engineering College has been omitted from the list of the Centres ?

(b) Is it not a fact that Aligarh Centre was included in the list on the special request of the Muslim League Party ? Is it not a fact that one of the Inspectors and Advisers who deal with the War Technicians' class is a Muslim ? If the answer is in the negative, what is the number of Muslim Inspectors ?

The Honourable Dr. B. R. Ambedkar: (a) There is no scheme under consideration of the Labour Department at present for developing any training centre, either in the United Provinces or anywhere else, into a polytechnic. The question of selecting-any centre for this purpose does not therefore arise.

(b) In view of the reply given to (a) above the fist part of the question under (b) does not arise. As regards the rest of part (b) none of the Regional Inspectors under the Technical Training scheme is a Muslim and there are no officers designated as " Advisers ".

342

[f.13]